Why use it? Identify records blocking or complicating a submission so staff can correct the authoritative source and resubmit clean data.
Find discrepancies: Use the record identifiers and error details to locate the source row. Correct the SIS, HR, course, or local source system, resubmit, and confirm the error clears. It contains record-level or identifying information and should remain restricted to authorized users.
Why use it? Review staff counts or assignments and identify differences between CALPADS, human-resources records, credentials, and the master schedule.
Find discrepancies: Compare each result with HR position records, SEID and demographic data, credentials, job classification, FTE, and teaching or support assignments. It contains record-level or identifying information and should remain restricted to authorized users.
Why use it? Review staff counts or assignments and identify differences between CALPADS, human-resources records, credentials, and the master schedule.
Find discrepancies: Compare each result with HR position records, SEID and demographic data, credentials, job classification, FTE, and teaching or support assignments. It contains record-level or identifying information and should remain restricted to authorized users.
Why use it? Review course, class, enrollment, or completion results and find differences between CALPADS and the master schedule or student course history.
Find discrepancies: Compare CALPADS detail with the master schedule, section identifiers, content area, staff assignment, enrollment dates, credits, grades, and transcript history. It contains record-level or identifying information and should remain restricted to authorized users.
Why use it? Review course, class, enrollment, or completion results and find differences between CALPADS and the master schedule or student course history.
Find discrepancies: Compare CALPADS detail with the master schedule, section identifiers, content area, staff assignment, enrollment dates, credits, grades, and transcript history. It contains record-level or identifying information and should remain restricted to authorized users.
Why use it? Confirm which students and schools contribute to the selected enrollment measure and spot unexpected changes in status, grade, or subgroup totals.
Find discrepancies: Compare the report with the census-day SIS roster. Trace school, enrollment status, grade, start date, exit date, and overlapping student-information records. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
1.1 - Enrollment - Primary and Short-term Enrollment Count by Subgroup
Start here · EnrollmentPublic sharing · Yes
Why use it? Confirm primary and short-term enrollment counts by school and subgroup, and identify unexpected changes from the prior certified year.
Find discrepancies: Open Report 1.2 and compare its students with census-day SIS enrollment, grade, and exit records. Report 1.1 contains aggregate information that CALPADS identifies as publicly available through DataQuest and Ed-Data.
Why use it? Review the students or counts CALPADS treats as dropouts and identify schools or student groups that need investigation.
Find discrepancies: Move from the aggregate to the supporting student list, then compare enrollment, exit, completion, and subsequent-enrollment evidence in the SIS and counseling records. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Review how student exits are classified and find patterns that may signal missing enrollments, incorrect exit reasons, or incomplete follow-up.
Find discrepancies: Compare student-level results with SIS withdrawal records, transfer documentation, completion status, and any later enrollment known to the LEA. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Review the students or counts CALPADS treats as dropouts and identify schools or student groups that need investigation.
Find discrepancies: Move from the aggregate to the supporting student list, then compare enrollment, exit, completion, and subsequent-enrollment evidence in the SIS and counseling records. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Validate the students and eligibility factors contributing to LCFF unduplicated pupil counts before certification or fiscal review.
Find discrepancies: Drill to the student list and compare enrollment, English learner, meal eligibility, foster, homeless, migrant, and direct-certification evidence with authorized source systems. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Validate the students and eligibility factors contributing to LCFF unduplicated pupil counts before certification or fiscal review.
Find discrepancies: Drill to the student list and compare enrollment, English learner, meal eligibility, foster, homeless, migrant, and direct-certification evidence with authorized source systems. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Validate the students and eligibility factors contributing to LCFF unduplicated pupil counts before certification or fiscal review.
Find discrepancies: Drill to the student list and compare enrollment, English learner, meal eligibility, foster, homeless, migrant, and direct-certification evidence with authorized source systems. It contains record-level or identifying information and should remain restricted to authorized users.
Why use it? Validate the students and eligibility factors contributing to LCFF unduplicated pupil counts before certification or fiscal review.
Find discrepancies: Drill to the student list and compare enrollment, English learner, meal eligibility, foster, homeless, migrant, and direct-certification evidence with authorized source systems. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Identify the students included in each school’s Report 1.1 enrollment count.
Find discrepancies: Compare the list with the census-day SIS roster. Check school, enrollment status, grade, start and exit dates, and missing overlapping student-information records. This report contains student-level identifiers and should remain restricted to authorized users.
Why use it? Validate the students and eligibility factors contributing to LCFF unduplicated pupil counts before certification or fiscal review.
Find discrepancies: Drill to the student list and compare enrollment, English learner, meal eligibility, foster, homeless, migrant, and direct-certification evidence with authorized source systems. It contains record-level or identifying information and should remain restricted to authorized users.
Why use it? Confirm which students and schools contribute to the selected enrollment measure and spot unexpected changes in status, grade, or subgroup totals.
Find discrepancies: Compare the report with the census-day SIS roster. Trace school, enrollment status, grade, start date, exit date, and overlapping student-information records. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Confirm which students and schools contribute to the selected enrollment measure and spot unexpected changes in status, grade, or subgroup totals.
Find discrepancies: Compare the report with the census-day SIS roster. Trace school, enrollment status, grade, start date, exit date, and overlapping student-information records. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Validate graduate and completer outcomes and identify students whose enrollment, exit, or completion evidence does not support the reported result.
Find discrepancies: Drill to student detail and compare completion codes, diploma or certificate evidence, exit dates, cohort membership, and subsequent enrollment history. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Validate graduate and completer outcomes and identify students whose enrollment, exit, or completion evidence does not support the reported result.
Find discrepancies: Drill to student detail and compare completion codes, diploma or certificate evidence, exit dates, cohort membership, and subsequent enrollment history. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Validate graduate and completer outcomes and identify students whose enrollment, exit, or completion evidence does not support the reported result.
Find discrepancies: Drill to student detail and compare completion codes, diploma or certificate evidence, exit dates, cohort membership, and subsequent enrollment history. It contains record-level or identifying information and should remain restricted to authorized users.
Why use it? Review the students or counts CALPADS treats as dropouts and identify schools or student groups that need investigation.
Find discrepancies: Move from the aggregate to the supporting student list, then compare enrollment, exit, completion, and subsequent-enrollment evidence in the SIS and counseling records. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Review prior-year dropouts submitted by the LEA and identify student groups requiring investigation.
Find discrepancies: Use Report 1.8 to identify students, then compare enrollment, exit, completion, and subsequent-enrollment records. Report 1.24 does not adjust for re-enrollment in another LEA; compare Report 1.14 or 8.1c when the state result differs. Review small subgroup counts before public sharing.
Why use it? Confirm which students and schools contribute to the selected enrollment measure and spot unexpected changes in status, grade, or subgroup totals.
Find discrepancies: Compare the report with the census-day SIS roster. Trace school, enrollment status, grade, start date, exit date, and overlapping student-information records. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Review certified enrollment by school, grade, gender, and race or ethnicity—even after the Fall 1 certification window closes.
Find discrepancies: Compare unexpected totals with Reports 1.1 and 1.2, then reconcile individual students with the census-day SIS roster. The report is aggregate, but review small subgroup counts and local disclosure requirements before sharing it publicly.
Why use it? Confirm which students and schools contribute to the selected enrollment measure and spot unexpected changes in status, grade, or subgroup totals.
Find discrepancies: Compare the report with the census-day SIS roster. Trace school, enrollment status, grade, start date, exit date, and overlapping student-information records. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Review the students or counts CALPADS treats as dropouts and identify schools or student groups that need investigation.
Find discrepancies: Move from the aggregate to the supporting student list, then compare enrollment, exit, completion, and subsequent-enrollment evidence in the SIS and counseling records. It contains record-level or identifying information and should remain restricted to authorized users.
Why use it? Review Title III eligible immigrant counts and the underlying demographic and enrollment factors used to identify the reported population.
Find discrepancies: Compare the supporting students with SIS birth-country, birth-date, and cumulative U.S.-school-enrollment history; resolve differences with authorized program staff. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Review Title III eligible immigrant counts and the underlying demographic and enrollment factors used to identify the reported population.
Find discrepancies: Compare the supporting students with SIS birth-country, birth-date, and cumulative U.S.-school-enrollment history; resolve differences with authorized program staff. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
2.10 - English Language Acquisition Status - Census Comparison Student List
Investigate · Student listPublic sharing · No
Why use it? Check English learner status, services, language, or reclassification results and identify records that do not match local program evidence.
Find discrepancies: Compare student-level results with the English learner system, assessment and reclassification records, service documentation, and effective dates in CALPADS. It contains record-level or identifying information and should remain restricted to authorized users.
2.12 - English Language Acquisition Status - ELs Reclassified RFEP
Review · ReportPublic sharing · Review
Why use it? Check English learner status, services, language, or reclassification results and identify records that do not match local program evidence.
Find discrepancies: Compare student-level results with the English learner system, assessment and reclassification records, service documentation, and effective dates in CALPADS. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Use this report to answer its stated CALPADS reporting question and identify results that warrant local verification.
Find discrepancies: Use the most detailed supporting report available, compare it with the authoritative local source, correct that source, rerun CALPADS, and confirm the difference clears. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Use this report to answer its stated CALPADS reporting question and identify results that warrant local verification.
Find discrepancies: Use the most detailed supporting report available, compare it with the authoritative local source, correct that source, rerun CALPADS, and confirm the difference clears. It contains record-level or identifying information and should remain restricted to authorized users.
2.16 - English Language Acquisition Status - ELs Reclassified RFEP
Review · ReportPublic sharing · Review
Why use it? Check English learner status, services, language, or reclassification results and identify records that do not match local program evidence.
Find discrepancies: Compare student-level results with the English learner system, assessment and reclassification records, service documentation, and effective dates in CALPADS. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
2.16 - English Language Acquisition Status - ELs Reclassified RFEP
Review · ReportPublic sharing · Review
Why use it? Check English learner status, services, language, or reclassification results and identify records that do not match local program evidence.
Find discrepancies: Compare student-level results with the English learner system, assessment and reclassification records, service documentation, and effective dates in CALPADS. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
2.17 - English Language Acquisition Status - ELs Reclassified RFEP Student List
Investigate · Student listPublic sharing · No
Why use it? Check English learner status, services, language, or reclassification results and identify records that do not match local program evidence.
Find discrepancies: Compare student-level results with the English learner system, assessment and reclassification records, service documentation, and effective dates in CALPADS. It contains record-level or identifying information and should remain restricted to authorized users.
2.2 - Title III Eligible Immigrants - Count by Birth Country
Reconcile · CountPublic sharing · Review
Why use it? Review Title III eligible immigrant counts and the underlying demographic and enrollment factors used to identify the reported population.
Find discrepancies: Compare the supporting students with SIS birth-country, birth-date, and cumulative U.S.-school-enrollment history; resolve differences with authorized program staff. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
2.4 - English Learner Education Services - Student Count Unduplicated
Review · CountPublic sharing · Review
Why use it? Check English learner status, services, language, or reclassification results and identify records that do not match local program evidence.
Find discrepancies: Compare student-level results with the English learner system, assessment and reclassification records, service documentation, and effective dates in CALPADS. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
2.4 - English Learner Education Services - Student Count Unduplicated
Reconcile · CountPublic sharing · Review
Why use it? Check English learner status, services, language, or reclassification results and identify records that do not match local program evidence.
Find discrepancies: Compare student-level results with the English learner system, assessment and reclassification records, service documentation, and effective dates in CALPADS. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
2.5 - English Learner Education Services - Unduplicated Count of Teachers Providing EL Services
Review · CountPublic sharing · Review
Why use it? Check English learner status, services, language, or reclassification results and identify records that do not match local program evidence.
Find discrepancies: Compare student-level results with the English learner system, assessment and reclassification records, service documentation, and effective dates in CALPADS. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
2.5 - English Learner Education Services - Unduplicated Count of Teachers Providing EL Services
Reconcile · CountPublic sharing · Review
Why use it? Check English learner status, services, language, or reclassification results and identify records that do not match local program evidence.
Find discrepancies: Compare student-level results with the English learner system, assessment and reclassification records, service documentation, and effective dates in CALPADS. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Check English learner status, services, language, or reclassification results and identify records that do not match local program evidence.
Find discrepancies: Compare student-level results with the English learner system, assessment and reclassification records, service documentation, and effective dates in CALPADS. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
2.7 - English Learner Education Services - Student List
Investigate · Student listPublic sharing · No
Why use it? Check English learner status, services, language, or reclassification results and identify records that do not match local program evidence.
Find discrepancies: Compare student-level results with the English learner system, assessment and reclassification records, service documentation, and effective dates in CALPADS. It contains record-level or identifying information and should remain restricted to authorized users.
2.8 - English Language Acquisition Status - Count by Primary Language
Review · CountPublic sharing · Review
Why use it? Check English learner status, services, language, or reclassification results and identify records that do not match local program evidence.
Find discrepancies: Compare student-level results with the English learner system, assessment and reclassification records, service documentation, and effective dates in CALPADS. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
2.8 - English Language Acquisition Status - Count by Primary Language
Reconcile · CountPublic sharing · Review
Why use it? Check English learner status, services, language, or reclassification results and identify records that do not match local program evidence.
Find discrepancies: Compare student-level results with the English learner system, assessment and reclassification records, service documentation, and effective dates in CALPADS. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
2.9 - English Language Acquisition Status - Census Comparison
Review · TrendPublic sharing · Review
Why use it? Check English learner status, services, language, or reclassification results and identify records that do not match local program evidence.
Find discrepancies: Compare student-level results with the English learner system, assessment and reclassification records, service documentation, and effective dates in CALPADS. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
2.9 - English Language Acquisition Status - Census Comparison
Compare · TrendPublic sharing · Review
Why use it? Check English learner status, services, language, or reclassification results and identify records that do not match local program evidence.
Find discrepancies: Compare student-level results with the English learner system, assessment and reclassification records, service documentation, and effective dates in CALPADS. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Review course, class, enrollment, or completion results and find differences between CALPADS and the master schedule or student course history.
Find discrepancies: Compare CALPADS detail with the master schedule, section identifiers, content area, staff assignment, enrollment dates, credits, grades, and transcript history. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
3.10 - Course Sections Completed - Count and Details for Dept. Courses
Investigate · DetailPublic sharing · No
Why use it? Review course, class, enrollment, or completion results and find differences between CALPADS and the master schedule or student course history.
Find discrepancies: Compare CALPADS detail with the master schedule, section identifiers, content area, staff assignment, enrollment dates, credits, grades, and transcript history. It contains record-level or identifying information and should remain restricted to authorized users.
3.11 - Course Sections completed - Student List for Dept. Courses
Investigate · Student listPublic sharing · No
Why use it? Review course, class, enrollment, or completion results and find differences between CALPADS and the master schedule or student course history.
Find discrepancies: Compare CALPADS detail with the master schedule, section identifiers, content area, staff assignment, enrollment dates, credits, grades, and transcript history. It contains record-level or identifying information and should remain restricted to authorized users.
3.14 - Career Technical Education Noncompleter Participants - Count
Review · CountPublic sharing · Review
Why use it? Validate graduate and completer outcomes and identify students whose enrollment, exit, or completion evidence does not support the reported result.
Find discrepancies: Drill to student detail and compare completion codes, diploma or certificate evidence, exit dates, cohort membership, and subsequent enrollment history. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
3.14 - Career Technical Education Noncompleter Participants - Count
Reconcile · CountPublic sharing · Review
Why use it? Validate graduate and completer outcomes and identify students whose enrollment, exit, or completion evidence does not support the reported result.
Find discrepancies: Drill to student detail and compare completion codes, diploma or certificate evidence, exit dates, cohort membership, and subsequent enrollment history. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
3.15 - Career Technical Education Noncompleter Participants - Student List
Investigate · Student listPublic sharing · No
Why use it? Validate graduate and completer outcomes and identify students whose enrollment, exit, or completion evidence does not support the reported result.
Find discrepancies: Drill to student detail and compare completion codes, diploma or certificate evidence, exit dates, cohort membership, and subsequent enrollment history. It contains record-level or identifying information and should remain restricted to authorized users.
3.16 - Educational Options Course Completion - Count of Students
Reconcile · CountPublic sharing · Review
Why use it? Use this report to answer its stated CALPADS reporting question and identify results that warrant local verification.
Find discrepancies: Use the most detailed supporting report available, compare it with the authoritative local source, correct that source, rerun CALPADS, and confirm the difference clears. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Use this report to answer its stated CALPADS reporting question and identify results that warrant local verification.
Find discrepancies: Use the most detailed supporting report available, compare it with the authoritative local source, correct that source, rerun CALPADS, and confirm the difference clears. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
3.19 - Career Technical Education Completers - Count by Pathway
Review · CountPublic sharing · Review
Why use it? Validate graduate and completer outcomes and identify students whose enrollment, exit, or completion evidence does not support the reported result.
Find discrepancies: Drill to student detail and compare completion codes, diploma or certificate evidence, exit dates, cohort membership, and subsequent enrollment history. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Confirm which students and schools contribute to the selected enrollment measure and spot unexpected changes in status, grade, or subgroup totals.
Find discrepancies: Compare the report with the census-day SIS roster. Trace school, enrollment status, grade, start date, exit date, and overlapping student-information records. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Use this report to answer its stated CALPADS reporting question and identify results that warrant local verification.
Find discrepancies: Use the most detailed supporting report available, compare it with the authoritative local source, correct that source, rerun CALPADS, and confirm the difference clears. It contains record-level or identifying information and should remain restricted to authorized users.
Why use it? Confirm which students and schools contribute to the selected enrollment measure and spot unexpected changes in status, grade, or subgroup totals.
Find discrepancies: Compare the report with the census-day SIS roster. Trace school, enrollment status, grade, start date, exit date, and overlapping student-information records. It contains record-level or identifying information and should remain restricted to authorized users.
3.4 - NCLB Core Course Section Compliance - Count by Content Area
Reconcile · CountPublic sharing · Review
Why use it? Review course sections for the applicable compliance measure and identify content-area or assignment results that require credential and schedule review.
Find discrepancies: Compare each section with the master schedule, course content, assigned educator, SEID, credentials, and local compliance review. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Review course sections for the applicable compliance measure and identify content-area or assignment results that require credential and schedule review.
Find discrepancies: Compare each section with the master schedule, course content, assigned educator, SEID, credentials, and local compliance review. It contains record-level or identifying information and should remain restricted to authorized users.
3.6 - Course Section Enrollment - Count by Content Area
Reconcile · CountPublic sharing · Review
Why use it? Confirm which students and schools contribute to the selected enrollment measure and spot unexpected changes in status, grade, or subgroup totals.
Find discrepancies: Compare the report with the census-day SIS roster. Trace school, enrollment status, grade, start date, exit date, and overlapping student-information records. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
3.7 - Course Section Enrollment - Count and Details
Investigate · DetailPublic sharing · No
Why use it? Confirm which students and schools contribute to the selected enrollment measure and spot unexpected changes in status, grade, or subgroup totals.
Find discrepancies: Compare the report with the census-day SIS roster. Trace school, enrollment status, grade, start date, exit date, and overlapping student-information records. It contains record-level or identifying information and should remain restricted to authorized users.
Why use it? Confirm which students and schools contribute to the selected enrollment measure and spot unexpected changes in status, grade, or subgroup totals.
Find discrepancies: Compare the report with the census-day SIS roster. Trace school, enrollment status, grade, start date, exit date, and overlapping student-information records. It contains record-level or identifying information and should remain restricted to authorized users.
3.9 - Course Sections Completed - Count and Details for Dept. Courses
Investigate · DetailPublic sharing · No
Why use it? Review course, class, enrollment, or completion results and find differences between CALPADS and the master schedule or student course history.
Find discrepancies: Compare CALPADS detail with the master schedule, section identifiers, content area, staff assignment, enrollment dates, credits, grades, and transcript history. It contains record-level or identifying information and should remain restricted to authorized users.
Why use it? Review staff counts or assignments and identify differences between CALPADS, human-resources records, credentials, and the master schedule.
Find discrepancies: Compare each result with HR position records, SEID and demographic data, credentials, job classification, FTE, and teaching or support assignments. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Review staff counts or assignments and identify differences between CALPADS, human-resources records, credentials, and the master schedule.
Find discrepancies: Compare each result with HR position records, SEID and demographic data, credentials, job classification, FTE, and teaching or support assignments. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
4.2 - Staff - Count and FTE by Job Classification Disaggregated
Reconcile · CountPublic sharing · Review
Why use it? Review staff counts or assignments and identify differences between CALPADS, human-resources records, credentials, and the master schedule.
Find discrepancies: Compare each result with HR position records, SEID and demographic data, credentials, job classification, FTE, and teaching or support assignments. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Review staff counts or assignments and identify differences between CALPADS, human-resources records, credentials, and the master schedule.
Find discrepancies: Compare each result with HR position records, SEID and demographic data, credentials, job classification, FTE, and teaching or support assignments. It contains record-level or identifying information and should remain restricted to authorized users.
Why use it? Review staff counts or assignments and identify differences between CALPADS, human-resources records, credentials, and the master schedule.
Find discrepancies: Compare each result with HR position records, SEID and demographic data, credentials, job classification, FTE, and teaching or support assignments. It contains record-level or identifying information and should remain restricted to authorized users.
Why use it? Review staff counts or assignments and identify differences between CALPADS, human-resources records, credentials, and the master schedule.
Find discrepancies: Compare each result with HR position records, SEID and demographic data, credentials, job classification, FTE, and teaching or support assignments. It contains record-level or identifying information and should remain restricted to authorized users.
4.5 - Staff Non-Classroom Based or Support Assignment - Detail
Review · DetailPublic sharing · No
Why use it? Review staff counts or assignments and identify differences between CALPADS, human-resources records, credentials, and the master schedule.
Find discrepancies: Compare each result with HR position records, SEID and demographic data, credentials, job classification, FTE, and teaching or support assignments. It contains record-level or identifying information and should remain restricted to authorized users.
4.5 - Staff Non Classroom Based or Support Assignment - Detail
Investigate · Staff detailPublic sharing · No
Why use it? Review staff counts or assignments and identify differences between CALPADS, human-resources records, credentials, and the master schedule.
Find discrepancies: Compare each result with HR position records, SEID and demographic data, credentials, job classification, FTE, and teaching or support assignments. It contains record-level or identifying information and should remain restricted to authorized users.
Why use it? Review program participation counts or students and verify that eligibility, membership dates, and school ownership match authorized program records.
Find discrepancies: Drill to student detail and compare program codes, eligibility evidence, membership dates, school ownership, and the program office’s authorized roster. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Review program participation counts or students and verify that eligibility, membership dates, and school ownership match authorized program records.
Find discrepancies: Drill to student detail and compare program codes, eligibility evidence, membership dates, school ownership, and the program office’s authorized roster. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
5.2 - Program Participants - NCLB Title I Part A Basic Targeted Education Services
Review · ReportPublic sharing · Review
Why use it? Review program participation counts or students and verify that eligibility, membership dates, and school ownership match authorized program records.
Find discrepancies: Drill to student detail and compare program codes, eligibility evidence, membership dates, school ownership, and the program office’s authorized roster. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Review program participation counts or students and verify that eligibility, membership dates, and school ownership match authorized program records.
Find discrepancies: Drill to student detail and compare program codes, eligibility evidence, membership dates, school ownership, and the program office’s authorized roster. It contains record-level or identifying information and should remain restricted to authorized users.
5.4 - Homeless Students Enrolled - Unduplicated Count by School
Review · CountPublic sharing · Review
Why use it? Validate the students counted as experiencing homelessness and reconcile enrollment and program dates with the authorized local liaison roster.
Find discrepancies: Compare the student list with the liaison’s authorized roster, enrollment spans, program membership dates, and school ownership; protect housing-status information. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
5.4 - Homeless Students Enrolled - Unduplicated Count by School
Reconcile · CountPublic sharing · Review
Why use it? Validate the students counted as experiencing homelessness and reconcile enrollment and program dates with the authorized local liaison roster.
Find discrepancies: Compare the student list with the liaison’s authorized roster, enrollment spans, program membership dates, and school ownership; protect housing-status information. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Validate the students counted as experiencing homelessness and reconcile enrollment and program dates with the authorized local liaison roster.
Find discrepancies: Compare the student list with the liaison’s authorized roster, enrollment spans, program membership dates, and school ownership; protect housing-status information. It contains record-level or identifying information and should remain restricted to authorized users.
Why use it? Use this report to answer its stated CALPADS reporting question and identify results that warrant local verification.
Find discrepancies: Use the most detailed supporting report available, compare it with the authoritative local source, correct that source, rerun CALPADS, and confirm the difference clears. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Review incidents, offenses, actions, removals, restraints, or seclusions and identify records that do not match locally approved discipline documentation.
Find discrepancies: Move from counts to supporting detail, then compare incident date, school, offense, action, duration, and special education protections with approved local records. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Use this report to answer its stated CALPADS reporting question and identify results that warrant local verification.
Find discrepancies: Use the most detailed supporting report available, compare it with the authoritative local source, correct that source, rerun CALPADS, and confirm the difference clears. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Review incidents, offenses, actions, removals, restraints, or seclusions and identify records that do not match locally approved discipline documentation.
Find discrepancies: Move from counts to supporting detail, then compare incident date, school, offense, action, duration, and special education protections with approved local records. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Use this report to answer its stated CALPADS reporting question and identify results that warrant local verification.
Find discrepancies: Use the most detailed supporting report available, compare it with the authoritative local source, correct that source, rerun CALPADS, and confirm the difference clears. It contains record-level or identifying information and should remain restricted to authorized users.
Why use it? Review incidents, offenses, actions, removals, restraints, or seclusions and identify records that do not match locally approved discipline documentation.
Find discrepancies: Move from counts to supporting detail, then compare incident date, school, offense, action, duration, and special education protections with approved local records. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Review incidents, offenses, actions, removals, restraints, or seclusions and identify records that do not match locally approved discipline documentation.
Find discrepancies: Move from counts to supporting detail, then compare incident date, school, offense, action, duration, and special education protections with approved local records. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Use this report to answer its stated CALPADS reporting question and identify results that warrant local verification.
Find discrepancies: Use the most detailed supporting report available, compare it with the authoritative local source, correct that source, rerun CALPADS, and confirm the difference clears. It contains record-level or identifying information and should remain restricted to authorized users.
Why use it? Review incidents, offenses, actions, removals, restraints, or seclusions and identify records that do not match locally approved discipline documentation.
Find discrepancies: Move from counts to supporting detail, then compare incident date, school, offense, action, duration, and special education protections with approved local records. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Review incidents, offenses, actions, removals, restraints, or seclusions and identify records that do not match locally approved discipline documentation.
Find discrepancies: Move from counts to supporting detail, then compare incident date, school, offense, action, duration, and special education protections with approved local records. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Use this report to answer its stated CALPADS reporting question and identify results that warrant local verification.
Find discrepancies: Use the most detailed supporting report available, compare it with the authoritative local source, correct that source, rerun CALPADS, and confirm the difference clears. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
7.16 - Incident Removals for Students with Disabilities - Count
Coordinate · CountPublic sharing · Review
Why use it? Review the selected special education population, plan, service, setting, meeting, or outcome measure and identify records requiring program review.
Find discrepancies: Compare the supporting student list with the special education system. Check plan, meeting, service, disability, setting, status, and effective dates with program staff. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
7.16 - Incident Removals for Students with Disabilities - Count
Review · CountPublic sharing · Review
Why use it? Review the selected special education population, plan, service, setting, meeting, or outcome measure and identify records requiring program review.
Find discrepancies: Compare the supporting student list with the special education system. Check plan, meeting, service, disability, setting, status, and effective dates with program staff. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Use this report to answer its stated CALPADS reporting question and identify results that warrant local verification.
Find discrepancies: Use the most detailed supporting report available, compare it with the authoritative local source, correct that source, rerun CALPADS, and confirm the difference clears. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
7.17 - Unilateral Removals for Students with Disabilities - Count
Coordinate · CountPublic sharing · Review
Why use it? Review the selected special education population, plan, service, setting, meeting, or outcome measure and identify records requiring program review.
Find discrepancies: Compare the supporting student list with the special education system. Check plan, meeting, service, disability, setting, status, and effective dates with program staff. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
7.17 - Unilateral Removals for Students with Disabilities - Count
Review · CountPublic sharing · Review
Why use it? Review the selected special education population, plan, service, setting, meeting, or outcome measure and identify records requiring program review.
Find discrepancies: Compare the supporting student list with the special education system. Check plan, meeting, service, disability, setting, status, and effective dates with program staff. It is aggregate, but review small cells, access restrictions, and local disclosure requirements before sharing.
Why use it? Use this report to answer its stated CALPADS reporting question and identify results that warrant local verification.
Find discrepancies: Use the most detailed supporting report available, compare it with the authoritative local source, correct that source, rerun CALPADS, and confirm the difference clears. It contains record-level or identifying information and should remain restricted to authorized users.
7.18 - Incident Removals, Restraints and Seclusions for Students with Disabilities - Student List
Coordinate · Student listPublic sharing · No
Why use it? Review the selected special education population, plan, service, setting, meeting, or outcome measure and identify records requiring program review.
Find discrepancies: Compare the supporting student list with the special education system. Check plan, meeting, service, disability, setting, status, and effective dates with program staff. It contains record-level or identifying information and should remain restricted to authorized users.
Why use it? Use this report to answer its stated CALPADS reporting question and identify results that warrant local verification.
Find discrepancies: Use the most detailed supporting report available, compare it with the authoritative local source, correct that source, rerun CALPADS, and confirm the difference clears. It contains record-level or identifying information and should remain restricted to authorized users.
Why use it? Use this report to answer its stated CALPADS reporting question and identify results that warrant local verification.
Find discrepancies: Use the most detailed supporting report available, compare it with the authoritative local source, correct that source, rerun CALPADS, and confirm the difference clears. It contains record-level or identifying information and should remain restricted to authorized users.