Skip to main content

CALPADS error brief · SELA

SELA0589

RFEP Student cannot be reclassified prior to being administered the summative assessment.
Severity Fatal
Error type Input Validation
Record type SELA

Official CALPADS rule

What CALPADS is rejecting

Summative testing window begins annually on February 1st; therefore, a student who took the initial on or after July 1st of same AY cannot be reclassified prior to that date.

Focus fields

Fields validated

12.13 English Language Acquisition Status Code 12.14 English Language Acquisition Status Start Date

Recommended correction path

Suggested resolution

CALPADS SELA correction guide

SELA0589: RFEP Submitted Before a Required Summative Assessment

A student identified as EL during the current academic year cannot be reclassified before receiving the applicable Summative ELPAC or Summative Alternate ELPAC. An Initial ELPAC result identifies the student; it is not the Summative result required for reclassification Criterion 1.

Focus fields: ELAS Code (12.13), ELAS Start Date (12.14), Initial/Summative ELPAC history, and RFEP effective date

Recommended correction path

  1. 1

    Confirm the EL identification date

    Review the ELAS history and Initial ELPAC result. If the student became EL on or after July 1 of the current academic year, identify the first Summative administration for which the student is eligible.

  2. 2

    Verify Summative completion and score

    In TOMS, confirm the correct SSID, test type, administration year, completion status, and official result. Do not treat scheduling, partial testing, or the Initial ELPAC as a completed Summative assessment.

  3. 3

    Apply all four reclassification criteria

    The statewide ELP criterion is only one part of reclassification. Confirm the locally approved process also documents teacher evaluation, parent opinion and consultation, and comparison of basic skills.

  4. 4

    Correct or hold the RFEP record

    If Summative testing has not occurred, withdraw the premature RFEP transaction and keep the student EL. If testing and all criteria are complete, correct any inaccurate ELAS/RFEP dates using the supporting record.

  5. 5

    Verify testing and status systems together

    Confirm CALPADS retains EL until the approved RFEP date, TOMS eligibility is correct, and the final RFEP record reaches all instructional, assessment, and monitoring systems.

Deeper dive: Summative ELPAC and reclassification

English learner data, assessment, and monitoring timeline
Start of school / new enrollmentEnrollment, SSID, Home Language Survey, SENR, and SELA/TBD must align quickly.
Days 1–20: data identification and CALPADS/TOMS readinessDays 21–30: testing time remaining
This 20/10 split illustrates the risk of delay—not a recommended schedule. Data work and testing should begin as early and concurrently as possible.
February 1–May 31: Summative windowTest every eligible enrolled EL student; reconcile CALPADS and TOMS throughout the window. For 2025–26, operational testing dates are February 2–May 31, 2026.
Reclassification decisionUse the official Summative result plus teacher evaluation, parent consultation, and basic-skills comparison before posting RFEP.
Years 1–4 after RFEPMonitor academic progress, document reviews and interventions, and keep SIS, CALPADS, and EL-program systems aligned.

What the Summative ELPAC does

It measures the annual progress of students already identified as English learners in Listening, Speaking, Reading, and Writing. Eligible EL students are assessed annually until they exit EL services through reclassification.

The annual window

The statewide annual window is February 1 through May 31; for 2025–26, the operational calendar runs February 2 through May 31, 2026. Check the current-year calendar before scheduling because operational dates can shift.

Why it is required for RFEP

A student without a Summative ELPAC or Summative Alternate ELPAC score is not eligible for reclassification even if the student meets locally determined criteria. For the regular Summative ELPAC, Overall Performance Level 4 satisfies statewide Criterion 1; for the Summative Alternate ELPAC, the statewide criterion is Overall PL 3.

It is one criterion—not the whole decision

California requires four criteria: an objective English-proficiency assessment, teacher evaluation, parent opinion and consultation, and comparison of basic skills. The LEA’s locally approved process must document all four.

Assessment coordinators cannot test an invisible student

CALPADS ELAS data drives TOMS eligibility. Before and during the window, data and assessment teams should reconcile EL rosters, new enrollments, SSIDs, grade levels, school assignments, testing type, and RFEP changes. A delayed correction can consume the limited time needed to schedule domains, address absences, complete makeups, and resolve further system errors.

Recommended operating rhythm

  • Before the window: reconcile CALPADS and TOMS EL rosters; assign named owners for exceptions.
  • Weekly during the window: review newly enrolled EL students, untested/partially tested students, transfers, and data mismatches.
  • Before reclassification: verify the official Summative result and all three locally determined criteria; preserve the decision record.
  • Near the close: coordinate RFEP uploads and remaining testing so eligible students are not incorrectly removed from—or left on—the test roster.
  • After RFEP: begin the required four-year academic monitoring process and reconcile downstream systems.

Integration opportunity: Ellevation and the district data ecosystem

Ellevation is widely used as an English learner program-management platform and can import data from leading student information systems, Initial and Summative ELP assessments—including ELPAC—and records for former EL students. California districts also use it to support reclassification and monitoring workflows.

The exact integration is district-specific. Do not assume ELAS changes safely flow in both directions. Establish an approved field-level contract identifying the authoritative source, direction, frequency, owner, and reconciliation rule for each element.

SISEnrollment, demographics, grade, school, and local program fields
CALPADS ↔ TOMSState ELAS and assessment eligibility/results exchange
EllevationEL program workflow, assessment context, reclassification documentation, and former-EL monitoring
ReconciliationException reports, named owners, timestamps, and confirmation back in authoritative systems

Minimum integration checklist

  • SSID and local student ID matching
  • Enrollment, school, grade, and exit dates
  • ELAS code and effective date
  • Initial and Summative ELPAC administration year, test type, completion, and results
  • RFEP effective date and evidence that all four criteria were completed
  • Four annual monitoring checkpoints, forms, interventions, and completion status
  • Controls preventing an EL-program platform from silently overwriting authoritative SIS or CALPADS history

Review Ellevation’s published data and assessment integration information

Before closing the ticket

  • Preserve the evidence and approval supporting the correction.
  • Verify the result in CALPADS, not only the SIS.
  • When testing or RFEP is affected, reconcile TOMS and the assessment team’s roster.

Official references

SIS help-desk directory

Alphabetized for convenience. Inclusion is not an endorsement or market ranking. Access may require a customer account.