CALPADS error brief · SINC
SINC0653E1
Official CALPADS rule
What CALPADS is rejecting
Focus fields
Fields validated
SINC Data 18.06 - Academic Year ID 18.07 - SSID 18.13 - Incident ID LocalRecommended correction path
Suggested resolution
CALPADS End-of-Year certification correction guide - Warning DD validation
SINC0653E1: Student should not have the same Incident ID in two different schools
The following combination of fields may not be duplicated in more than one record: Academic Year ID, Reporting LEA, SSID, Incident ID Local
Official Version 18 validation
Severity: Warning Type: DD
the same Incident ID Local in two schools requires one supported school attribution for the student incident within the Reporting LEA and academic year.
Fields validated: SINC Data
Recommended correction path
- 1
Preserve the failed cross-file evidence
Save student, school, Reporting LEA, academic year, Incident ID Local where applicable, all relevant dates, the same Incident ID Local in two schools, and the records needed to establish one supported school attribution for the student incident within the Reporting LEA and academic year.
- 2
Reconstruct the incident in the behavior system
Use original incident documentation, participants, school, occurrence date, and local incident identifier.
- 3
Compare every SINC row
Check Academic Year, Reporting LEA, School of Attendance, SSID, Incident ID Local, and Incident Occurrence Date character for character.
- 4
Distinguish duplication from multiple participants
Confirm whether rows represent one student, different students in one event, or an accidental duplicate.
- 5
Choose the supported identifier and school
Follow the authoritative behavior record; do not renumber or move an incident merely to avoid validation.
- 6
Correct the behavior-system source
Repair duplicate generation, school attribution, date, or incident-key mapping.
- 7
Rebuild the entire incident chain
Regenerate SINC, SIRS, and SOFF together and confirm all rows share the supported keys.
Before closing the correction
- The student, school, Reporting LEA, and academic year are correct.
- the same Incident ID Local in two schools is supported by authorized evidence.
- one supported school attribution for the student incident within the Reporting LEA and academic year is supported on the relevant date.
- All connected records and regenerated reports reconcile.







































































