Skip to main content
Vintage computer equipment: Our staff installing the latest upgrades.

SDLA Compliance Resource

Prepare CCSPP Site Progress and Sustainability Information

Prepare site evidence for the annual community-schools progress process, and verify whether a separate site submission is required for the covered cycle.

  • LCAP & Accountability
  • Student Support
Timing2027 site form, separate submission and deadline: pending applicable CDE/grant notice
Applies toSchoolsites in covered CCSPP implementation/grant cycles; verify one-time versus ongoing funding
Authority and scopeState program/grant reporting context; separate 2027 site-level submission remains unverified

In Plain Language: Prepare site evidence for the annual community-schools progress process, and verify whether a separate site submission is required for the covered cycle.

Why this matters

Keep the allocation, reporting cycle, responsible entity and receiving system explicit. A county planning date, a historical portal window and a statutory deadline are different kinds of evidence.

Ownership and recipient

Responsible owner: Community-school site lead with the LEA CCSPP coordinator. Recipient: LEA coordination and any CDE/S-TAC system named in applicable instructions.

Requirement, applicability and cycle controls

  • Keep implementation progress, outcomes, sustainability planning and expenditure reporting distinct. Do not automatically create a second standalone sustainability filing for 2027.
  • Identify the award/cohort, implementation year, schoolsite, funding pathway and covered reporting period before applying legacy grant instructions.
  • Under EC 8903, the LEA has an annual progress-report obligation. That alone does not establish an independently due statewide schoolsite form or the county reference’s proposed 2027 cutoff.

From site evidence to CCSPP site progress and sustainability information: the SDLA ITO workflow

Whether a separate site submission is required depends on the covered cycle and the issuing CDE notice. This SDLA ITO (Input, Transformation, Output) graphic shows how the award and cohort record, the current form and issuing notice, and site evidence become the source responses, the LEA handoff, and any required submission confirmation.

SDLA ITO: eleven steps from the award and cohort record, the current form and issuing notice, and site evidence, through collecting progress evidence, confirming the submission route, and review, to the source responses, the LEA handoff, and any required submission confirmation.
Read down each column, then move to the next: Input identifies what to collect; Transformation covers collecting progress evidence, confirming the submission route, and review; Output covers the source responses, the LEA handoff, and any required submission confirmation. The 2027 site form, deadline, and submission are pending the applicable CDE notice.

Open the full-size workflow graphic

Operational workflow

  1. Identify each funded site and applicable grant/ongoing-program instructions.
  2. Collect implementation progress, pupil outcomes, family/community participation, supports and sustainability evidence with site partners.
  3. Confirm whether the current APR embeds sustainability and whether the site responds directly or supplies the LEA.
  4. Record the issuing CDE/S-TAC notice, actual deadline and local preparation target separately.
  5. Review, submit only as instructed, and retain source responses and receipt.

Evidence to retain

  • Award/cohort record
  • Current form and issuing notice
  • Site evidence and stakeholder input
  • LEA handoff and any required submission confirmation

Sources and authority

Authority and source-version guide · Annual Compliance Calendar

Targeted source/conflict review: October 21, 2026. Pending items above are unresolved verification questions, not confirmed statewide deadlines. Local preparation steps do not create new statewide filings.