SDLA Compliance Resource
County Superintendent Recommendations for LCAP Amendments
An operational guide to the county recommendation step in the 2026–27 LCAP accountability cycle.
State county-review duties and local intake procedures
A county superintendent performs these statewide statutory duties for school-district LCAPs. A county-specific portal or earlier intake target is a separate local procedure.
- EC 52070(a): the district files its adopted LCAP/annual update with the county superintendent no later than five days after adoption. The county may request written clarification by August 15; the district board responds in writing within fifteen days of the request.
- The county may send written amendment recommendations within fifteen days after receiving the district response. The district board considers those recommendations in a public meeting within fifteen days of receipt. Retain actual delivery/receipt dates; these are triggered clocks, not identical fixed dates for every district.
- The county superintendent approves by October 8 if the statutory template, budget, expenditure and applicable carryover/service conditions are met. Keep local board adoption distinct from reviewer approval and retain the approval/revision record.
- Where the county superintendent has jurisdiction over a single district, the State Superintendent performs the EC 52070 duties. COE-own LCAP review and charter submission follow their own authorities; this district approval chain must not be generalized to them.
- If a county requests an earlier upload, checklist or local format, record the county, notice, receiving system and local target separately from EC 52070. No statewide earlier intake date is established by a county worksheet.
Authority: EC 52070: district/county clocks and single-district exception. Reviewed October 21, 2026.
In Plain Language: After reviewing the district’s clarification response, the county superintendent may issue written recommendations for amendments within the next 15-calendar-day period.
Why this matters
Recommendations move the review from information gathering to proposed corrective action. Precision matters because the district must consider them publicly on another short clock.
Primary ownership
Primary owner: county superintendent/review team. Partners: county fiscal and program reviewers, legal counsel, district superintendent/LCAP lead, and records staff.
From the district response to written county recommendations: the SDLA ITO workflow
This county step is a bounded review that turns the district's response into specific, actionable recommendations. This SDLA ITO (Input, Transformation, Output) graphic shows how the district's response, the open issue matrix, and the county's program and fiscal review become the recommendation analysis, the final written recommendations, and proof of receipt.
Operational workflow
- Confirm the district response receipt date and recommendation deadline.
- Resolve answered items and isolate remaining approval concerns.
- Draft specific, actionable recommendations with supporting analysis.
- Complete county program, fiscal, and authority review.
- Transmit in writing and preserve proof of district receipt.
Implementation pathway
Evidence to retain
- District response and receipt record
- Updated issue matrix
- Recommendation analysis and citations
- Final written recommendations
- Delivery and receipt evidence
Official guidance and help
- CDE Local Control and Accountability PlanCurrent templates, instructions, and resources
- CDE LCFF Frequently Asked QuestionsState review and approval context
- Education Code section 52062District consultation, hearing, adoption, submission, and posting
- Education Code section 52070County review, clarification, recommendations, and approval
Source review completed August 30, 2026. Verify the current CDE template, instructions, statutory dates, reviewing-authority procedures, and local meeting calendar before acting.

